The concept of jurisdiction as \"the Geographical frontiers for political sovereignty and range of the state competence\" is of eminent significance in the discipline of international law. One of the principal particulars of every constitution is the item through which the will of the public is laid out via the constitutors will concerning the territory bonders of the state, specifies its confines and nominates manners of defending it. The present constitution of Iran has been derived from the Islamic revolution in which two peculiarities have proceeded: Introspection and Extrospection.The present constitution of the Iranian and has had an eye onto the geographical frontiers while passing through the political bonders via ideological assessments. The constitution of the Islamic republic of Iran is a sample of composition in constitution codification. A section of the subject matter of the concept of territory as in the Islamic rights & thought is linked with its sight into the concept of jurisdiction. Since the constitution of Iran relies on Islamic rules, consideration of the concept of jurisdiction is based on some kind of knowledge about the Islamic legal principles. The main question is: Have the concepts of Jurisdiction and Geographical frontiers any entities in the constitution of the Islamic republic of Iran? The minor queries are: In what Jurisdiction and political bonder have been applied in our constitution? Have the concepts of beyond-the-bonder / Universal and national orientations been applied in the constitution of the Islamic republic of Iran? Has the composition of the two concepts of political Geographical bonder / doctrinal borderless ness been attributed a contradictory or interactory peculiarity to our constitution? So, a combination of political realism / Legal idealism has been applied in adoption of the concept of jurisdiction due to the cultural particulars and the atmosphere created after the Islamic revolution

Keywords