The frame offered as emerging contract like "intentional assignment of contract" in jurisprudence and law refers to two contracts of elementary peace (settlement) and untitled contract, subject to article 10 of Iran Civil Code. However, the accuracy of the two contracts has been doubted seriously first from this perspective that peace is existed or possible in position of dispute and elementary peace is not legitimate and second, due to the origin of corruption and seizure of contracts, new frames could not be applied. In this study (conducted using analytical-descriptive method using library and documentary instruments in Imami (Shiite) jurisprudence and Iran Law), the problems with these frames have been analyzed and solved. Generalities of verses and narratives have been called as the most important evidence on the accuracy.

Keywords