Environmental Science and Pollution Research, ( ISI ), Year (2024-7)

Title : ( Analyzing sustainability in bread production: a life cycle assessment approach to energy, exergy and environmental footprint )

Authors: Mahta Rafiee , M. Hossein Abbaspour-Fard , Ava Heiari ,

Citation: BibTeX | EndNote

Abstract

Bread production is a pivotal component of global nutrition. However, its extensive production imposes significant strain on resources and energy, resulting in substantial environmental consequences. This study focuses on a multidimensional assessment of the environmental sustainability of the bread life cycle as a case study in Iran. By integrating four life cycle assessment (LCA) methods, this research demonstrates a comprehensive analysis of environmental effects, energy consumption, and exergy demand in bread production. It also identifies the hotspot stages and inputs within the bread production chain. Eventually, it proposes strategies for mitigating the environmental impacts in line with sustainable development goals. Data collection involved questionnaires by face-to-face interviews. The LCA evaluation was conducted using SimaPro software. Sustainability analysis was assessed using four different methods: CML, ReCiPe, cumulative energy demand (CED), and cumulative exergy demand (CExD) method, from cradle to bakery gate. The CML method results indicate that the highest environmental impacts are associated with marine aquatic ecotoxicity (157.04 to 193.36 kg 1,4-DB eq), fossil fuel depletion (11.05 to 12.73 MJ), eutrophication (4.20 × 10− 3 to 4.70 × 10− 3 kg PO4 −3 eq), acidification (8.09 × 10− 3 to 9.16 × 10− 3 kg SO2 eq), and global warming (0.61 to 0.69 kg CO2 eq). The ReCiPe method highlights wheat production stages and gas consumption as the most significant contributors to damage in terms of human health, ecosystems, and resource consumption indicators. The CED method reveals that fossil energy accounts for over 97% of the energy consumed during the bread life cycle. Energy consumption per kilogram of bread ranges from 12.07 to 13.93 MJ. The CExD method for producing 1 kg of traditional bread falls between 32.25 and 35.88 MJ. More than 60% of this value is attributed to renewable resources of water used in irrigation during the wheat farming stage, while over 35% is linked to non-renewable fossil resources, primarily due to the consumption of natural gas in bakery operations. To assess the potential decrease in environmental emissions, a sensitivity analysis was performed, considering the effects of substituting natural gas with biogas and grid electricity with photovoltaic electricity in the bakery. Then, three improved scenarios were developed, each demonstrating effective reductions in environmental impacts, with the most remarkable decreases observed in marine aquatic ecotoxicity (55%) and fossil fuel depletion (44%). Overall, the findings demonstrate that Sangak bread production exhibits a more environmentally friendly profile than other types of bread. These results can guide decision-makers in the bread production industry towards implementing sustainable practices that prioritize resource efficiency and environmental conservation. Also, stakeholders can develop strategies to reduce the environmental impacts and work towards a more sustainable future.

Keywords

, Bread supply chain · Eco, friendly agri, food · Green baking · Sustainable food systems · LCA · CED · CExD
برای دانلود از شناسه و رمز عبور پرتال پویا استفاده کنید.

@article{paperid:1099415,
author = {Rafiee, Mahta and Abbaspour-Fard, M. Hossein and Heiari, Ava},
title = {Analyzing sustainability in bread production: a life cycle assessment approach to energy, exergy and environmental footprint},
journal = {Environmental Science and Pollution Research},
year = {2024},
month = {July},
issn = {0944-1344},
keywords = {Bread supply chain · Eco-friendly agri-food · Green baking · Sustainable food systems · LCA · CED · CExD},
}

[Download]

%0 Journal Article
%T Analyzing sustainability in bread production: a life cycle assessment approach to energy, exergy and environmental footprint
%A Rafiee, Mahta
%A Abbaspour-Fard, M. Hossein
%A Heiari, Ava
%J Environmental Science and Pollution Research
%@ 0944-1344
%D 2024

[Download]