Background: The goal of research in any country is scientific growth, with a key focus on empowering students to conduct high-quality research. This requires keeping pace with the latest advancements in the world, but in a principled manner by increasing students\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' motivation as their driving force for conducting research. This can only be achieved through proper training in utilizing these advancements, relying on the researcher themselves. Methods: Initially, the opinions of at least 10 artificial intelligence experts were collected using the Delphi method over three rounds, along with the opinions of 10 psychology experts over two rounds. The points obtained from the open-ended questions in the first round were transformed into questionnaires for each field, and this process continued until consensus was reached. Subsequently, based on the results from the previous stage and the theoretical foundations of social-cognitive theory, a five-session protocol was developed and confirmed by 10 experts from both fields for face and content validity. Results: The results obtained from the Delphi rounds contained 34 points regarding the training of using artificial intelligence tools, including a general introduction to the concept of chatbots and language models, introduction of general and specialized tools, correct and principled prompt writing, displaying errors, and cross-checking with scientific texts. It also included creating a proper culture regarding artificial intelligence as a research assistant rather than a research author, accepting ethical and content responsibility by the researcher, stating the policies of reputable global journals, and the necessity of adhering to them. Additionally, 44 points related to aligning education with social-cognitive theory, such as step-by-step training with visuals and personalization, the necessity of goal-setting and planning, utilizing the experiences of capable role models, and applying the taught materials were identified, along with 15 tools such as Chat GPT, Scopus AI, NotebookLM, and Scite AI. Despite the high content validity of this protocol (via 10 experts, CVR and CVI), the credibility of the Delphi results depends on the scientific credibility of its members. Since all participants in this research were faculty members of reputable universities, the high credibility of the obtained results can be emphasized. Conclusion: This educational program, considering the foundations of social-cognitive theory and its goals of self-regulation, self-efficacy, and research engagement of graduate students, can serve as an effective intervention for the future of research in the country, in line with global advancements and their proper utilization.

Keywords